Archive for the 'Business' Category

09
Oct

tim hamilton’s reel truth in advertising

When you think of short film, or web video, for some reason your mind wanders to artsy abstract movies that don’t have a point, any characters or just are utter shit. It can lead you to believe that all that’s out there is Hollywood. But the one thing the web is good for is producing work that is unregulated, so you can get away with whatever you want, and all the things you couldn’t do on broadcast.

In 1999, Tim Hamilton released “Truth In Advertising” which is a bit like “Liar, Liar” where everyone in an advertising agency says what they really think and mean instead of the laye of bullshit they indulge in every day.

It’s a work of genius and some of the most amazing writing you’ll experience for a long time to come.

And 3 years later…

If you like it, you can buy the original DVD from Amazon here:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B00006JO3C/

09
Oct

understanding the 36 hollywood human storylines

ModerScreenwriting has become a science, and what a fascinating science it is. A lot of people find writing awkward as it is so arbitrary and can generate so possibilities that it is difficult to get specific and focus. But like all things, storywriting has a formula, and genius storytellers (e.g. Quentin Tarantino) are the ones who reinvent it and breath fresh life into it.

Maybe you’ve been watching a film and are sure you’ve seen it before. Many people make the claim that Hollywood only has X number of plots/storylines, and they are continually re-used. And it’s essentially true. Understanding it is known as literary theory.

The basic storytelling formula is derived from Aristotle’s “3 Act Structure“. First, Act I sets up a situation and introduces the characters. Next, Act II complicates it and trashes it, and lastly, Act III provides a resolution. Within those acts, events that trigger major plot direction are added, known as “reversals”. In Hollywood it is known as getting your character up a tree, throwing rocks at him, and getting down out of the tree again.

Drama comes from conflict. In each story you have a protagonist (the good guy) and the antagonist (the bad guy). There is a source of conflict, because without conflict, you have no drama or story to tell of. Everything focuses around a person, or a group of people - every story is told through their eyes. It’s all about rhe characters. Everything else is paperwork.

You can group movies fairly easily:

  • ACTION
    • Buddy Pic
    • Cops & Crooks
    • Eighties
    • Gangster
    • Heist
    • Martial Arts
    • Pirates
    • Post-apocalyptic
    • Spies
    • Superheroes
    • Swashbuckler
    • Sword & Sorcery
    • Vengeance
    • War
    • Western
  • COMEDY
    • Black
    • Comedy of Errors
    • Dark
    • Dramedy
    • Genderbending
    • Mockumentary
    • Romantic
    • Satire
    • Screwball
    • Slapstick
    • Sophomoric
    • Spoof
    • Teen
    • Victorian
  • DRAMA
    • Academy Picture
    • Biography
    • Character Study
    • Class Struggle
    • Coming of Age
    • Courtroom
    • Crime
    • Epic
    • Family
    • Fighting Against The Odds
    • Historical
    • Melodrama
    • Period Piece
    • Political
    • Romantic
    • Terminal Illness
  • HORROR
    • B-Movie
    • Ghost
    • Gorefest
    • Monster
    • Nuclear Mutant
    • Occult
    • Serial Killer
    • lasher
    • Supernatural
    • Teen
    • Torture
    • Vampire
    • Werewolf
    • Witch
    • Zombie
  • ROMANTIC
    • Comedy
    • May-November
    • Separated By Society
    • Unrequited Love
    • Wedding
  • SCI-FI
    • Alien
    • Mutation
    • Cyborgs
    • Doppelganger
    • End of the World
    • Experiments
    • Magic
    • Monsters
    • Robots
    • Space Exploration
    • Space War
    • Supernatural
    • The Future
    • Time Travel
  • SUSPENSE
    • Detectives
    • Thriller
    • International Intrigue
    • Mistaken Identity
    • Mobster
    • Police Procedural
    • Political Thriller
    • Psychological Thriller
    • Spies
    • Whodunnit

In “The Basic Patterns of Plot“, Foster-Harris contends there are 3 types of plot:

  1. “’Type A, happy ending’”; which results when the central character (which he calls the “I-nitial” character) makes a sacrifice (a decision that seems logically “wrong”) for the sake of another.
  2. “’Type B, unhappy ending’”; this pattern follows when the “I-nitial” character does what seems logically “right” and thus fails to make the needed sacrifice.
  3. “’Type C,’ the literary plot, in which, no matter whether we start from the happy or the unhappy fork, proceeding backwards we arrive inevitably at the question, where we stop to wail.” This pattern requires more explanation (Foster-Harris devotes a chapter to the literary plot.) In short, the “literary plot” is one that does not hinge upon decision, but fate; in it, the critical event takes place at the beginning of the story rather than the end. What follows from that event is inevitable, often tragedy. (This in fact coincides with the classical Greek notion of tragedy, which is that such events are fated and inexorable.)

Modern literary theory goes further and defines 7 basic situations that all stories fit it into:

  1. [wo]man vs. nature
  2. [wo]man vs. man
  3. [wo]man vs. the environment
  4. [wo]man vs. machines/technology
  5. [wo]man vs. the supernatural
  6. [wo]man vs. self
  7. [wo]man vs. god/religion/supernatural

Then we look at specific subjects that dominate most books and films. Ronald Tobias propiosed 20 basic plots in his book “20 Master Plots“, which were:

  1. Quest
  2. Adventure
  3. Pursuit
  4. Rescue
  5. Escape
  6. Revenge
  7. The Riddle
  8. Rivalry
  9. Underdog
  10. Temptation
  11. Metamorphosis
  12. Transformation
  13. Maturation
  14. Love
  15. Forbidden Love
  16. Sacrifice
  17. Discovery
  18. Wretched Excess
  19. Ascension
  20. Descension

But the absolute master reference when it comes to storylines, plots and ideas was coined by Georges Polti in the 19th Century in his masterpiece “The Thirty-Six [36] Dramatic Situations” to categorise every dramatic situation that might occur in a story or performance.  He classical Greek texts, plus classical and contemporaneous French works. In his introduction, Polti claims to be continuing the work of Carlo Gozzi, who also identified 36 situations.

01. SUPPLICATION
(The dynamic elements technically necessary are: a Persecutor; a Suppliant; and a Power in authority, whose decision is doubtful)
A.

  1. Fugitives Imploring the Powerful for Help Against Their Enemies
  2. Assistance Implored for the Performance of a Pious Duty Which Has Been Forbidden
  3. (3) Appeals for a Refuge in Which to Die

B.

  1. Hospitality Besought by the Shipwrecked
  2. Charity Entreated by Those Cast Off by Their Own People, Whom They Have Disgraced
  3. Expiation: The Seeking of Pardon, Healing or Deliverance
  4. The Surrender of a Corpse, or of a Relic, Solicited

C.

  1. (Supplication of the Powerful for Those Dear to the Suppliant
  2. Supplication to a Relative in Behalf of Another Relative
  3. Supplication to a Mother’s Lover, in Her Behalf

02. DELIVERANCE
(Elements: an Unfortunate, a Threatener, a Rescuer)
A.

  1. Appearance of a Rescuer to the Condemned

B.

  1. A Parent Replaced Upon a Throne by His Children
  2. Rescue by Friends, or by Strangers Grateful for Benefits Or Hospitality

03. CRIME Pursued by Vengeance
(Elements: an Avenger and a Criminal)
A.

  1. The Avenging of a Slain Parent or Ancestor
  2. The Avenging of a Slain Child or Descendant
  3. Vengeance for a Child Dishonored
  4. The Avenging of a Slain Wife or Husband
  5. Vengeance for the Dishonor, or Attempted Dishonoring, of a Wife
  6. Vengeance for a Mistress Slain
  7. Vengeance for a Slain or Injured Friend
  8. Vengeance for a Sister Seduced

B.

  1. Vengeance for Intentional Injury or Spoliation
  2. Vengeance for Having Been Despoiled During Absence
  3. Revenge for an Attempted Slaying
  4. Revenge for a False Accusation
  5. Vengeance for Violation
  6. Vengeance for Having Been Robbed of One’s Own
  7. Revenge Upon a Whole Sex for a Deception by One

C.

  1. Professional Pursuit of Criminals

04. VENGEANCE Taken For Kindred Upon Kindred
(Elements: Avenging Kinsman; Guilty Kinsman; Remembrance of the Victim, a Relative of Both)
A.

  1. A Father’s Death Avenged Upon a Mother
  2. A Mother’s Death Avenged Upon a Father

B.

  1. A Brother’s Death Avenged Upon a Son

C.

  1. A Father’s Death Avenged Upon a Husband

D.

  1. A Husband’s Death Avenged Upon a Father

05. PURSUIT
(Elements: Punishment and Fugitive)
A.

  1. Fugitives from Justice Pursued for Brigandage, Political Offenses, Etc.

B.

  1. Pursued for a Fault of Love

C.

  1. A Hero Struggling Against a Power

D.

  1. A Pseudo-Madman Struggling Against an Iago-Like Alienist

06. DISASTER
(Elements: a Vanquished Power; a Victorious Enemy or a Messenger)
A.

  1. Defeat Suffered
  2. A Fatherland Destroyed
  3. The Fall of Humanity
  4. A Natural Catastrophe

B.

  1. A Monarch Overthrown

C.

  1. Ingratitude Suffered
  2. The Suffering of Unjust Punishment or Enmity
  3. An Outrage Suffered

D.

  1. Abandonment by a Lover or a Husband
  2. Children Lost by Their Parents

07. FALLING PREY To Cruelty Or Misfortune
(Elements: an Unfortunate; a Master or a Misfortune)
A.

  1. The Innocent Made the Victim of Ambitious Intrigue

B.

  1. The Innocent Despoiled by Those Who Should Protect

C.

  1. The Powerful Dispossessed and Wretched
  2. A Favorite or an Intimate Finds Himself Forgotten

D.

  1. The Unfortunate Robbed of Their Only Hope

08. REVOLT
(Elements: Tyrant and Conspirator)
A.

  1. A Conspiracy Chiefly of One Individual
  2. A Conspiracy of Several

B.

  1. Revolt of One Individual, Who Influences and Involves Others
  2. A Revolt of Many

09. DARING Enterprise
(Elements: a Bold Leader; an Object; an Adversary)
A.

  1. Preparations For War

B.

  1. War
  2. A Combat

C.

  1. Carrying Off a Desired Person or Object
  2. Recapture of a Desired Object

D.

  1. Adventurous Expeditions
  2. Adventure Undertaken for the Purpose of Obtaining a Beloved Woman

10. ABDUCTION
(Elements: the Abductor; the Abducted; the Guardian)
A.

  1. Abduction of an Unwilling Woman

B.

  1. Abduction of a Consenting Woman

C.

  1. Recapture of the Woman Without the Slaying of the Abductor
  2. The Same Case, with the Slaying of the Ravisher

D.

  1. Rescue of a Captive Friend
  2. Of a Child
  3. Of a Soul in Captivity to Error

11. THE ENIGMA
(Elements: Interrogator, Seeker and Problem)
A.

  1. Search for a Person Who Must Be Found on Pain of Death

B.

  1. A Riddle To Be Solved on Pain of Death
  2. The Same Case, in Which the Riddle is Proposed by the Coveted Woman

C.

  1. Temptations Offered With the Object of Discovering His Name
  2. Temptations Offered With the Object of Ascertaining the Sex
  3. Tests for the Purpose of Ascertaining the Mental Condition

12. OBTAINING
(Elements: a Solicitor and an Adversary Who is Refusing, or an Arbitrator and Opposing Parties)
A.

  1. Efforts to Obtain an Object by Ruse or Force

B.

  1. Endeavor by Means of Persuasive Eloquence Alone

C.

  1. Eloquence With an Arbitrator

13. ENMITY Of Kinsmen
(Elements: a Malevolent Kinsman; a Hatred or Reciprocally Hating Kinsman)
A.

  1. Hatred of Brothers — One Brother Hated by Several
  2. Reciprocal Hatred
  3. Hatred Between Relatives for Reasons of Self-Interest

B.

  1. Hatred of Father and Son — Of the Son for the Father
  2. Mutual Hatred
  3. Hatred of Daughter for Father

C.

  1. Hatred of Grandfather for Grandson

D.

  1. Hatred of Father-in-law for Son-in-law

E.

  1. Hatred of Mother-in-law for Daughter-in-law

F.

  1. Infanticide

14. RIVALRY Of Kinsmen
(Elements: the Preferred Kinsman; the Rejected Kinsman; the Object)
A.

  1. Malicious Rivalry of a Brother
  2. Malicious Rivalry of Two Brothers
  3. Rivalry of Two Brothers, With Adultery on the Part of One
  4. Rivalry of Sisters

B.

  1. Rivalry of Father and Son, for an Unmarried Woman
  2. Rivalry of Father and Son, for a Married Woman
  3. Case Similar to the Two Foregoing, But in Which the Object is Already the Wife of the Father
  4. Rivalry of Mother and Daughter

C.

  1. Rivalry of Cousins

D.

  1. Rivalry of Friends

15. MURDEROUS Adultery
(Elements: Two Adulterers; a Betrayed Husband or Wife)
A.

  1. The Slaying of a Husband by, or for, a Paramour
  2. The Slaying of a Trusting Lover

B.

  1. Slaying of a Wife for a Paramour, and in Self-Interest

16. MADNESS
(Elements: Madman and Victim)
A.

  1. Kinsmen Slain in Madness
  2. Lover Slain in Madness
  3. Slaying or Injuring of a Person not Hated

B.

  1. Disgrace Brought Upon Oneself Through Madness

C.

  1. Loss of Loved Ones Brought About by Madness

D.

  1. Madness Brought on by Fear of Hereditary Insanity

17. FATAL Imprudence
(Elements: The Imprudent; the Victim or the Object Lost)
A.

  1. Imprudence the Cause of One’s Own Misfortune
  2. Imprudence the Cause of One’s Own Dishonor

B.

  1. Curiosity the Cause of One’s Own Misfortune
  2. Loss of the Possession of a Loved One, Through Curiosity

C.

  1. Curiosity the Cause of Death or Misfortune to Others
  2. Imprudence the Cause of a Relative’s Death
  3. Imprudence the Cause of a Lover’s Death
  4. Credulity the Cause of Kinsmen’s Deaths

18. INVOLUNTARY Crimes Of Love
(Elements: the Lover, the Beloved; the Revealer)
A.

  1. Discovery that One Has Married One’s Mother
  2. Discovery that One Has Had a Sister as Mistress

B.

  1. Discovery that One Has Married One’s Sister
  2. The Same Case, in Which the Crime Has Been Villainously Planned by a Third Person
  3. Being Upon the Point of Taking a Sister, Unknowingly, as Mistress

C.

  1. Being Upon the Point of Violating, Unknowingly, a Daughter

D.

  1. Being Upon the Point of Committing an Adultery Unknowingly
  2. Adultery Committed Unknowingly

19. SLAYING of a Kinsman Unrecognized
(Elements: the Slayer, the Unrecognized Victim)
A.

  1. Being Upon the Point of Slaying a Daughter Unknowingly, by Command of a Divinity or an Oracle
  2. Through Political Necessity
  3. Through a Rivalry in Love
  4. Through Hatred of the Lover of the Unrecognized Daughter

B.

  1. Being Upon the Point of Killing a Son Unknowingly
  2. The Same Case, Strengthened by Machiavellian Instigations

C.

  1. Being Upon the Point of Slaying a Brother Unknowingly

D.

  1. Slaying of a Mother Unrecognized

E.

  1. A Father Slain Unknowingly, Through Machiavellian Advice

F.

  1. A Grandfather Slain Unknowingly, in Vengeance and Through Instigation

G.

  1. Involuntary Killing of a Loved Woman
  2. Being Upon the Point of Killing a Lover Unrecognized
  3. Failure to Rescue an Unrecognized Son

20. SELF-Sacrificing For An Ideal
(Elements: the Hero; the Ideal; the ‘Creditor’ or the Person or Thing Sacrificed)
A.

  1. Sacrifice of Life for the Sake of One’s Word
  2. Life Sacrifice for the Success of One’s People
  3. Life Sacrificed in Filial Piety
  4. Life Sacrificed for the Sake of One’s Faith

B.

  1. Both Love and Life Sacrificed for One’s Faith, or a Cause
  2. Love Sacrificed to the Interests of State

C.

  1. Sacrifice of Well-Being to Duty

D.

  1. The Ideal of ‘Honor’ Sacrificed to the Ideal of ‘Faith’

21. SELF-Sacrifice For Kindred
(Elements: the Hero; the Kinsman; the ‘Creditor’ or the Person or Thing Sacrificed)
A.

  1. Life Sacrificed for that of a Relative or a Loved One
  2. Life Sacrificed for the Happiness of a Relative or a Loved One

B.

  1. Ambition Sacrificed for the Happiness of a Parent
  2. Ambition Sacrificed for the Life of a Parent

C.

  1. Love Sacrificed for the Sake of a Parent’s Life
  2. For the Happiness of One’s Child
  3. The Same Sacrifice as 2, But Caused by Unjust Laws

D.

  1. Life and Honor Sacrificed for the Life of a Parent or Loved One
  2. Modesty Sacrificed for the Life of a Relative or a Loved One

22. ALL Sacrificed For A Passion
(Elements: the Lover, the Object of the Fatal Passion; the Person or Thing Sacrificed)
A.

  1. Religious Vows of Chastity Broken for a Passion
  2. Respect for a Priest Destroyed
  3. A Future Ruined by Passion
  4. Power Ruined by Passion
  5. Ruin of Mind, Health, and Life
  6. Ruin of Fortunes, Lives, and Honors

B.

  1. Temptations Destroying the Sense of Duty, of Piety, etc.

C.

  1. Destruction of Honor, Fortune, and Life by Erotic Vice
  2. The Same Effect Produced by Any Other Vice

23. NECESSITY Of Sacrificing Love Ones
(Elements: the Hero; the Beloved Victim; the Necessity for the Sacrifice)
A.

  1. Necessity for Sacrificing a Daughter in the Public Interest
  2. Duty of Sacrificing Her in Fulfillment of a Vow to God
  3. Duty of Sacrificing Benefactors or Loved Ones to One’s Faith

B.

  1. Duty of Sacrificing One’s Child, Unknown to Others, Under the Pressure of Necessity
  2. Duty of Sacrificing, Under the Same Circumstances, One’s Father or Husband
  3. Duty of Sacrificing a Son-in-law for the Public Good
  4. Duty of Contending with a Brother-in-Law for the Public Good
  5. Duty of Contending with a Friend

24. RIVALRY Of Superior And Inferior
(Elements: the Superior Rival; the Inferior Rival; the Object)
A.

  1. Masculine Rivalries; of a Mortal and an Immortal
  2. Of a Magician and an Ordinary Man
  3. Of Conqueror and Conquered
  4. Of a King and a Noble
  5. Of a Powerful Person and an Upstart
  6. Of Rich and Poor
  7. Of an Honored Man and a Suspected One
  8. Rivalry of Two Who are Almost Equal
  9. Of the Two Successive Husbands of a Divorcee

B.

  1. Feminine Rivalries; Of a Sorceress and an Ordinary Woman
  2. Of Victor and Prisoner
  3. Of Queen and Subject
  4. Of Lady and Servant
  5. Rivalry Between Memory or an Ideal (That of a Superior Woman) and a Vassal of Her Own

C.

  1. Double Rivalry (A loves B, who loves C, who loves D)

25. ADULTERY
(Elements: a Deceived Husband or Wife; Two Adulterers)
A.

  1. A Mistress Betrayed, For a Young Woman
  2. For a Young Wife

B.

  1. A Wife Betrayed, For a Slave Who Does Not Love in Return
  2. For Debauchery
  3. For a Married Woman
  4. With the Intention of Bigamy
  5. For a Young Girl, who Does Not Love in Return
  6. A Wife Envied by a Young Girl Who is in Love With Her Husband
  7. By a Courtesan

C.

  1. An Antagonistic Husband Sacrificed for a Congenial Lover
  2. A Husband, Believed to be Lost, Forgotten for a Rival
  3. A Commonplace Husband Sacrificed for a Sympathetic Lover
  4. A Good Husband Betrayed for an Inferior Rival
  5. For a Grotesque Rival
  6. For a Commonplace Rival, By a Perverse Wife
  7. For a Rival Less Handsome, But Useful

D.

  1. Vengeance of a Deceived Husband
  2. Jealousy Sacrificed for the Sake of a Cause
  3. Husband Persecuted by a Rejected Rival

26. CRIMES Of Love
(Elements: The Lover, the Beloved)
A.

  1. A Mother in Love with Her Son
  2. A Daughter in Love with her Father
  3. Violation of a Daughter by a Father

B.

  1. A Woman Enamored of Her Stepson
  2. A Woman and Her Stepson Enamored of Each Other
  3. A Woman Being the Mistress, at the Same Time, of a Father and Son, Both of Whom Accept the Situation

C.

  1. A Man Becomes the Lover of his Sister-in-Law
  2. A Brother and Sister in Love with Each Other

D.

  1. A Man Enamored of Another Man, Who Yields

E.

  1. A Woman Enamored of a Beast

27. DISCOVERY Of The Dishonor Of A Loved One
(Elements: the Discoverer; the Guilty One)
A.

  1. Discovery of a Mother’s Shame
  2. Discovery of a Father’s Shame
  3. Discovery of a Daughter’s Dishonor

B.

  1. Discovery of Dishonor in the Family of One’s Fiancee
  2. Discovery than One’s Wife Has Been Violated Before Marriage, Or Since the Marriage
  3. That She Has Previously Committed a Fault
  4. Discovery that One’s Wife Has Formerly Been a Prostitute
  5. Discovery that One’s Mistress, Formerly a Prostitute, Has Returned to Her Old Life
  6. Discovery that One’s Lover is a Scoundrel, or that One’s Mistress is a Woman of Bad Character
  7. The Same Discovery Concerning One’s Wife

C.

  1. Duty of Punishing a Son Who is a Traitor to Country
  2. Duty of Punishing a Son Condemned Under a Law Which the Father Has Made
  3. Duty of Punishing One’s Mother to Avenge One’s Father

28. OBSTACLES To Love
(Elements: Two Lovers, an Obstacle)
A.

  1. Marriage Prevented by Inequality of Rank
  2. Inequality of Fortune an Impediment to Marriage

B.

  1. Marriage Prevented by Enemies and Contingent Obstacles

C.

  1. Marriage Forbidden on Account of the Young Woman’s Previous Betrothal to Another

D.

  1. A Free Union Impeded by the Opposition of Relatives

E.

  1. By the Incompatibility of Temper of the Lovers

29. AN ENEMY Loved
(Elements: The Beloved Enemy; the Lover; the Hater)
A.

  1. The Loved One Hated by Kinsmen of the Lover
  2. The Lover Pursued by the Brothers of His Beloved
  3. The Lover Hated by the Family of His Beloved
  4. The Beloved is an Enemy of the Party of the Woman Who Loves Him

B.

  1. The Beloved is the Slayer of a Kinsman of the Woman Who Loves Him

30. AMBITION
(Elements: an Ambitious Person; a Thing Coveted; an Adversary)
A.

  1. Ambition Watched and Guarded Against by a Kinsman, or By a Person Under Obligation

B.

  1. Rebellious Ambition

C.

  1. Ambition and Covetousness Heaping Crime Upon Crime

31. CONFLICT With A God
(Elements: a Mortal, an Immortal)
A.

  1. Struggle Against a Deity
  2. Strife with the Believers in a God

B.

  1. Controversy with a Deity
  2. Punishment for Contempt of a God
  3. Punishment for Pride Before a God

32. MISTAKEN Jealousy
(Elements: the Jealous One; the Object of Whose Possession He is Jealous; the Supposed Accomplice; the Cause or the Author of the Mistake)
A.

  1. The Mistake Originates in the Suspicious Mind of the Jealous One
  2. Mistaken Jealousy Aroused by Fatal Chance
  3. Mistaken Jealousy of a Love Which is Purely Platonic
  4. Baseless Jealousy Aroused by Malicious Rumors

B.

  1. Jealousy Suggested by a Traitor Who is Moved by Hatred, or Self-Interest

C.

  1. Reciprocal Jealousy Suggested to Husband and Wife by a Rival

33. ERRONEOUS Judgment
(Elements: The Mistaken One; the Victim of the Mistake; the Cause or Author of the Mistake; the Guilty Person)
A.

  1. False Suspicion Where Faith is Necessary
  2. False Suspicion of a Mistress
  3. False Suspicion Aroused by a Misunderstood Attitude of a Loved One

B.

  1. False Suspicions Drawn Upon Oneself to Save a Friend
  2. They Fall Upon the Innocent
  3. The Same Case as 2, but in Which the Innocent had a Guilty Intention, or Believes Himself Guilty
  4. A Witness to the Crime, in the Interest of a Loved One, Lets Accusation Fall Upon the Innocent

C.

  1. The Accusation is Allowed to Fall Upon an Enemy
  2. The Error is Provoked by an Enemy

D.

  1. False Suspicion Thrown by the Real Culprit Upon One of His Enemies
  2. Thrown by the Real Culprit Upon the Second Victim Against Whom He Has Plotted From the Beginning

34. REMORSE
(Elements: the Culprit; the Victim or the Sin; the Interrogator)
A.

  1. Remorse for an Unknown Crime
  2. Remorse for a Parricide
  3. Remorse for an Assassination

B.

  1. Remorse for a Fault of Love
  2. Remorse for an Adultery

35. RECOVERY Of A Lost One
(The Seeker; the One Found)
A.

  1. A Child Stolen

B.

  1. Unjust Imprisonment

C.

  1. A Child Searches to Discover His Father

36. LOSS Of Loved Ones
(A Kinsman Slain; a Kinsman Spectator; an Executioner)
A.

  1. Witnessing the Slaying of Kinsmen While Powerless to Prevent It
  2. Helping to Bring Misfortune Upon One’s People Through Professional Secrecy

B.

  1. Divining the Death of a Loved One

C.

  1. Learning of the Death of a Kinsman or Ally, and Lapsing into Despair
08
Oct

a stormy foreclosure of insecure authority

The strange weeks continue and script 2 is well underway. Jase got married, Shaun is leaving for Vegas to get married, Kim gave birth to a girl, Chloe had a car accident, Jess is in Syria, Jack’s in the new AC/DC video, Franki’s left for LA, Dean is locked in at Heathrow, Stroop’s off to Australia and it just carries on. In a few months i will be in Jerusalem toasting that the first 30 bullshit years are done.

Today i also heard some very sad news. A body was found in Radford Park in Liphook, where i always used to walk every day (and still do when i visit). After speaking to Nat i found out it was an old friend of mine called Oli Softley who i used to hang around with occasionally back in the day. He became homeless and was living out of a tent in the woodland, and it seems his drug problem finally got the better of him as a walker found him dead. It’s scary how many of my friends died young. I’ve got used to it. although i know i shouldn’t be.

In case you hadn’t realised it yet, things really are very doom and gloom. If you study the history, you’ll find that despite the differing conditions in terms of war etc, the economic environment is very similar to that of the Great Depression of the 1930s. Now’s not the time to be stubborn and resistant about it, as you’ve already lost enough. The most important thing to know about the depression is that it started years before people noticed it. The main effects of the economic collapse only started to bite badly around 1935, when unemployment reached 25%.

9000 banks went bust back then. The climate of the day was one of “false prosperity” where moneylending was rampant and everything was financed on debt (ring any bells?), In the last few weeks we have seen the nationalisation of Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley, the near-collapse of HBOS through deposit withdrawal, and RBS is down 50%. Tonight the government pledged to increase our national debt by a third of our GDP (400BN) to part-nationalise and underwrite the debts of a whole raft of high-street banks, which out every household in the UK in for £13,000. The Americans just did a 700BN bail-out. This is total fucking madness.

It’s like trying to hold a cupboard’s doors shut when there is too much stuffed inside that keeps collapsing back onto you.

The reason i’m writing about it is more and more people are asking me what to do. I’m no maths or economics genius, and to be honest i’m not sure. But what i do understand is the basic laws of business and survival, as i learned them in blood, fire and anguish. There are a lot of very lost and frightened people out there at the moment not sure if they’ll have a job in a few weeks or whether they’ll lose their home.

Let’s start with the bad news. Recessions, slowdowns and depressions always last a hell of a lot longer than we expect them to. We’re talking 5-10 years. There is a very good likelihood that you will lose your job and possibly your home. In the very least your standard of living will drop and you will have major troubles working out how to keep all the things you have now on the income you have. We’re at the beginning of the cycle and it’s going to get a lot worse before it gets better. We will have a lot of false positives on the economic curve – it’ll seem like it’s getting better, but then it will crash again. The point of a depression is that even though it goes up and down, the figures are always below a certain line – trading and throughput is depressed.

So what can you do?

First, you need to start jettisoning excess baggage and trim the fat.

The people who have loaned you money will want it returned because they think you won’t be able to pay it back and also need the cash themselves – banks, credit card companies, loan/finance firms, retail stores and others. Get your debts paid off fast and get out now. Now is not the time to go out spending and racking up more debts. If you have serious debts you need to consolidate them and get a plan worked out for the worst case scenario. If you own a business, the bank won’t loan you anything and your customers won’t have much money to spend on you.

Next you need to ditch all your superfluous expenditure – all the luxurious shit you don’t need. That means getting rid of Sky and Virgin Media for a Freeview box, and a cheaper telephony provider other than BT. Bye bye magazine and DVD subscriptions (read it online), gym membership (create a plan of exercise in the open), expensive life insurance and more. If it’s not essential, get rid of it. Sell your car with the repayments and get something cheaper. Sell what you can now whilst the price is still reasonable and cattle panic-sell and flood the market. Use the bus. If you like spending £200 on a meal, then it’s premium organic fruit and veg and a new cookery course.

The first wave of people hit will be those in retail (as they rely on people paying with credit/store cards) and finance (for obvious reasons). Recruitment will be frozen everywhere, and then the job losses will start, You need to look at your job and see how depression-proof it is, and maybe changing career temporarily to something safer for up to a decade. Think i’m kidding? I’m not.

If you work for a moneylender (including leasing companies), get out right now. It doesn’t matter how good you are at your job or how indispensable you are, it’s about how well the company is fairing and how good the CFO is. Your qualifications mean nothing on the company’s balance sheet.

Your house value is going to decrease, and so is your ability to pay back your mortgage. So if you bought high, you’re in for some serious shit. If you don’t have a lot of equity (less than 10%), it’s time to think about selling up and taking on more flexible arrangements. Now is the time to think about that travelling around the world you always wanted to do for a bit and missing out the carnage. If you do decide to travel and sit it all out, register yourself as non-domicile with HMRC and set up a savings account to put 10% of what you earn overseas into for when you come back and look for a job.

Look at a second/back-up career or a second home-based business (e.g. eBay) to top up your income. If you’re smart, you’ll see lots of stuff coming on to the market very cheaply that you can snap up and make a great profit from. Get on a training course and extend your working day to bring in more cash. Don’t rely on your main job, and don’t rely on the company you work for’s assurances. They give you the “we’re in a great position” talk to fend off competitors backchat and stop shareholders from pulling out their investments. It’s all bullshit and you’ll be the last to know.

When others start jettisoning the excess baggage, they will try and sell everything they can, including all the stuff they bought on loans and credit cards. It’s an opportunity to pick things up very cheap. So wait for all the lemmings to sell their stuff, as they’ll take any price. And that is business markets 101 – buy low, sell high. Just wait it out. The cattle have bought high, and will be selling low out of panic to get money to keep up the payments on their house. That’s also an interesting point – if you haven’t bought yet, wait. There will be a whole wave of repossessions and you can get a place for 20% of what your trendy “property ladder” friends paid.

And that is why i personally haven’t bought a house yet.

As panic sets in, everyone will try to raise prices in a desperate bid to raise revenue. Household bills will go up, rent will get high and customer service will be slimmer. It’s a blip. Give it time and they will all lower prices once their existing customer bases deserts because they can’t afford it. It’ll keep getting lower so just wait.

It goes without saying not to put your money into stock markets or PE-based start-up companies. Invest in physical wealth (true wealth – things that retain their value) and unusual areas, like entertainment. You can’t afford to speculate. When times are hard, you can guarantee people will drink more, take more drugs, gamble more, watch more shit TV, fight more and commit more crime. Movies make great returns. Art grows its value. Gold is the all-time security. Debt collectors will be making a lot of money. If you make an investment now, it will be a long-term one and you can’t expect to cash out or make a return for a decade.

Most companies will look to save money, so they will outsource what they can. If you’re a computer programmer, it’ll be cheaper to hire someone from India or the Baltic states. If you make things in the factory, it’ll go to China, as it already is. If you’re a project manager, someone else’s job will get doubled up and yours will go. If you’re in recruitment, no-one is recruiting – move on. Don’t start a business that offers obscure or new products or one in a different market. Adapt your sales strategy to appeal to your customers need to save money. Don’t get involved in anything that involves customer’s spending excess cash as they won’t have it.

Whether or not you take your money out of a bank is up to you, but i’d be inclined to spread assets. The Bank of Ireland is guaranteeing 100% of savings, unlike the limit of £35k in the UK. If the bank collapses, you’re going to lose your money. Even if the government guarantees it, you won’t see it for a long time. The government’s backup is linked to the economy – if the economy goes, so does the government’s bonds.

What you need to understand is that cash does not have a constant value, and it only constitutes less than 5% of the money system. There is a very distinct difference between wealth and cash. A painting you own that is worth 500k won’t deviate and it is an asset. You sell that asset to exchange it for generated cash you can use. Cash in the bank is not security – physical wealth is. Put your money into wealth that is sustainable and will act as a preservative for your money.

You need to get a plan going, and face the things you don’t want to face. This is uncomfortable so you will procrastinate and find anything else to do other than work out what to do. You need to have 3 plans – a) if it stays the same, b) for when it gets worse, and c) the very worst case scenario. The sooner you deal with it, the less you will lose. Yes, it may be an inconvenience, but bankruptcy and homelessness is a lot more of an inconvenience.

If you think this is drastic, think back to last year when i wrote about the banks “battening down the hatches”. Everyone i know who is very rich or materially wealthy who can afford good advice pulled their money out a long time ago because they knew what was about to happen. That’s why they are still wealthy and very secure.

A lot of the way i have lived in the last few years have been about this depression. I didn’t buy a house, maintain a constant home or work for a corporate employer. I sold my business whilst i was ahead, have never trusted debt or credit of any form, and am actually financially conservative in terms of my resistance to buying high. Perhaps the reasoning behind many of my decisions will become clearer now and there will be less of the cynicism about my motives and so called “achievements”.

I saw a lot of this coming and reconciled my position by thinking ahead for the next 10 years. I didn’t buy a house when the price was sky high as everyone i know did, as i’m waiting for it to go bottom-low during re-possession time like a vulture. I didn’t saddle myself with debts and vaults of consumer high street bullshit because i knew it would be impossible to repay once the credit boom wave broke. You have to see the big picture and understand where you are going instead of just reacting in the moment blindly. If i want to get married and have kids, there was no way i was doing it having bought high, lost all my money and in the middle of a recession. Better to consolidate, wait, and do it when the cycle turns so my family are more secure.

If i am going to have a family, i want their home set on a rock foundation of stone rather than being a rudderless ship in a storm-drenched ocean. True security for me is not about wealth, it is about smart decision-making, conservative management and planning ahead. It’s about doing your research, choosing the right timing and being wise. You may not be able to anticipate everything, but the economic and scientific laws that govern us allow us to offset enough of the risk to avoid the worst of the trouble. I will never allow my wife, kids or extended family to know the pain and vulnerability i felt of losing your security, or the pain i will feel for allowing them to get anywhere near it.

I’ve learned a lot in the last few weeks about leadership, and the most profound part of it being the massive responsibility towards others that you have. Kate was telling me a story about her and her mum frantically locking up the house and hiding when they heard noises in their back garden, and i remarked that what they needed was the strength and presence of a man in the house to fend off the burglar in the dark at 3am.

It was around then when i saw what Virgilio said in a clearer light about most people being helpless and vulnerable – they put their trust in authority and look up to leaders for hope. When you fail, so do the hearts of those who look to you for strength, confidence and security. I realised that i spent the first 30 years of my life scared, untrusting and being betrayed by corrupted authority for one very simple reason – so that when i became an authority, i would never let the same thing happen to those who put their trust and hope in me.

“For the heart of the king is in the hand of the Lord.”

07
Oct

zeitgeist II: addendum & the venus project

Every so often something comes your way that changes the way you think about life, the planet, the world and humanity itself. Maybe that’s someone dying, making a million, having a child or just waking up to something new that you never saw before. Tonight i was doing some research on the similarities of the Great Depression of the 30s to the current “credit crunch” after we discussing the very scary thought that the conditions we are walking into now are very similar to those that allowed Adolf Hitler to come to power.

And i remembered Jim mentioned Zeitgeist II was coming out in October. So i loaded it up out of curiosity.  Although i may not agree with everything said in it, my world changed tonight. My thinking shifted. Essentially it illustrates how monetary systems work, why we have wars and drug problems, and how the need to profit has ruined almost everything we know. It’s very similar to what Sir Ken Robinson said in his TED.com talk about modern education systems being created to meet the needs of industrialisation and slanted in favour of training worker bees rather than encouraging creativity. Money and debt are the same - without debt, there is no money. Debt is a means of power.

We’ve heard all that before of course. What’s proposed here is very simple and provocative: we no longer have any need for money, so let’s just get rid of it and replace it with something more effective and beneficial.

Consider that for a second. What would a world without money look like? Curious? Watch it.

Zeitgeist: Addendum
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

You have grown up in a monetary system that only evolved a few hundred years ago. You know nothing else. Open your mind for a second. What if we eradicated money and the monetary system? Can you conceive in your mind of world where money doesn’t exist like it was for all time except the last few centuries?

“In a world where 1% of the population owns 40% of the planet’s wealth, where 34,000 children die every single day from poverty and preventable diseases, and where 50% of the world’s population lives on less than $2 USD a day, one thing is very clear - something is very wrong.”

None of that is going to be solved by money. Money is what causes it.

No buying things or bills. No advertising. No jobs or labour. Everything we need available as something exchanged or for free. It’s an upgrade to a more advanced operating system for humanity. Solve the problems by taking out the root instead of just fighting fires and coping with them.

What an idea. What a vision.

The premise is equally simple. The earth already has everything we need. 70% of the earth is water. Plant and animal life is self-sustaining for food. The sun, earth’s core and weather are self-sustaining energy sources that can provide all our electricity needs. Work can be automated with machines. Technology is the key (and only) factor that improves quality of life, and it comes freely from human ingenuity and creativity if the resources are available.

Funnily enough, it’s a key theme in Star Trek. The assumed history is that money was just a very primitive way of doing things and was actually the cause of the planet’s problems that was being used as a way to cure itself, which is absurd. In a few hundred years, will the generations study us in total disbelief that we were so basic, neanderthal and outdated as to live around a monetary system?

To appear credible, you need an alternative. One of those alternatives is a resource-based economy proposed by the Venus Project think-tank.

What is a “resource-based economy”?
Simply stated, a Resource-Based Economy utilizes existing resources rather than money and provides an equitable method of distributing these resources in the most efficient manner for the entire population. It is a system in which all goods and services are available without the use of money, credits, barter, or any other form of debt or servitude.

Read more about the Venus Project here:
http://www.thevenusproject.com/

“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
Jiddu Krishnamurti

06
Oct

help to make it truly salvation for april

The collaborative scriptwriting for “Michael’s Resignation” went so well that the natural progression was to write another drama to follow it. At the time of our first draft, around 70 writers created a 93 page script with over 20,000 words, and more just kept registering. The same theme kept getting repeated over and over in emails and messages - “i wish i could have written more for it.” So, i devised another story, and it looks like we’ll making this the 2nd in a series of 5 based around life-changing events that happen duing the “credit crunch”.

This time our anti-hero character April is going to do the opposite of Michael, starting off as a baddie and going on a rampage of good.

Here’s the overview:

“A self-obsessed bulimic fashionista (April Heartley) who finally loses the Covent Garden styling boutique she has been using to fund her lavish lifestyle because of the “credit crunch” tries to kill herself and is unexpectedly rescued by the tramp she abuses every day. After waking up in hospital and learning he is gravely ill, she embarks on a desperate race across London to find him and save his life in return, and in doing so, sets off a chain reaction of events that forever changes the lives of everyone around her.”

You can read the treatment (summary) for the drama is here:
http://www.azcameron.co.uk/Salvation.For.April.pdf

You can join in the writing on PlotBot.com here:
http://www.plotbot.com/screenplays/salvation_for_april/join/996080ed

The next one is tentatively called “Aidan’s Darkest Sermon” and about a holier-than-thou local ex-alcoholic vicar who murders the prostitute he accidentally sleeps with out of maddening jealousy and obsession.

04
Oct

crack dealing: the worst job you can have

TED.com does it again with its brilliant insight. If you thought crack dealing and gangster life was a lucrative and glamorous life, then think again. You’d earn more and be better off working at your local MacDonalds. Most street dealers live with their moms. You would only know that if you spent time with the big gangs analysing their books and studying their organisation academically.

Freakonomics author Steven Levitt presents new data on the finances of drug dealing. Contrary to popular myth, he says, being a street-corner crack dealer isn’t lucrative: It pays below minimum wage. And your boss can kill you.”

30
Sep

my not-so-open letter to channel 4

Today i wrote to a very senior person i know at Channel 4 who is head of their Specialist Factual department but as it became broader in its scope and is philosophy-defining it deserved a re-print here. Names and details are omitted, naturally.

————————————————————-

Thanks for your responses to the format proposals i submitted last week via the 4Producers/EWorks system. I didn’t want to flood your inbox with replies to each so i’ve combined them all into a single mail here. I appreciate they came through as a lump rather than a flow.

We were saddened by the rejection of Chris Morris’s latest series. But we’re also very surprised as they would seem to have a natural home at C4. I can imagine it must be hard to make decisions to trust program formats where the company behind them has so little track record despite a fantastic-looking team. It must also be difficult to see credibility when decisions on talent are left open and not tied up on the ticket. I can’t imagine how difficult it must be for you to get good quality programming generated in your department onto the schedule when the constant internal pressures seem to be for “tabloid” content.

Before any proposals or pitches are made for films or programs, we put them in front of a focus group of 500 people from 16-40 in different places and demographics to get an idea as to which are most popular. It may not seem much but it’s 10% of BARB’s capacity of 5000 or so and ultimately staying close to the customer is what keeps us all in business and ensures viewership. In all of our studies the same feedback is arriving – a boredom/intense dislike of reality TV and tabloid content. Our research (and others) seems to suggest that people are just watching it because “there’s nothing else on”. They are dying for something better. They want more interesting and challenging programming that is as entertaining as it is thought-provoking. They feel patronised. I cannot over-emphasise how many times we are all approached and told how fed up those customers are. What we have done is listen to the viewers and give them what they want, and reassured them that broadcasters care and will be faithful to that demand because the last thing they want viewers to feel is that they are monopolistically abused.

I think i’ve identified a number of themes which i’d like to address with the same candour, if you would allow me to.

The first is concerning underestimation of the tasks involved. I’m fortunate in having built a team that has successfully delivered programming for the likes of Discovery and the BBC that has taken considerably more than “Dark Nature” or “Worldchangers” requires to achieve the dynamic you rightly point out. Both myself and Joanne Reay have run and exited multi-million pound companies and part of that success has arguably been managing resources and cashflow, as well as finding ways to accomplish great things without necessarily having the greatest means. The awkward truth i’ve come to see, especially in TV production, is that production companies frequently bloat their budgets to squeeze as much money out of broadcasters as they can – a good example being a spec document my friend at a web agency received recently from Fremantle for £30k for a simple website that could have been built in 48hrs for 5% of the cost with the right software and expertise. This kind of thing is implicit everywhere in media, but from experience, we don’t just believe, but know, that the amount of money being claimed just isn’t needed. Yes, there are great pressures, but effective management of resources, personnel and processes mean that we can operate at a more efficient level, and of course we will come in and pitch low because we’re hungrier and want the business. The cheaper we do it, the more programming you can re-commission us for.

The second is talent. Even though none of us deny the need for programs to have talent as a draw, one thing we all share in our team is a resistance to celebrity-reliant programming. It seems these days that formats are created by getting a bunch of them together and building a show around it, as it’s what seems to draw in the crowd. Our belief is that the people, the story and the subject material are what compels the audience and tells the story and the talent points in the direction of the story, which is central. We believe genuinely excellent presenting talent generates and casts a spotlight on guests and featured parts of a story rather than stealing it for themselves, and is part of a bigger story or issue that has importance to us all. For our own part we want discover and nurture new talent, and we know broadcasters will always want to discuss it (and a lot of the time have an idea that might be more effective that we missed), so we leave it open to show our willingness to work together in partnership.

The third and last is about being conceptual. Tabloid content is like a greasy hamburger – it might ease the hunger, but if you had your choice, you’d order a cordon bleu fillet steak with champagne. And it never fills you up. We want to look deeper and ask what the hunger is and why it’s there. We’re going into a recession and its hard time for everyone, and of course nobody wants to get home to more doom and gloom when they switch on. But being hungry doesn’t mean you want a hamburger if you had the choice, even though you might take it if there was no other food around or if it was the first thing on offer. Escapism doesn’t have to be mindless – it can mean becoming lost in a new subject, topic, area, story, character, premise or moment. Difficult or deeper topics don’t have to be less entertaining, as our approach is about finding new ways to show new angles on well-explained things (e.g. drug chemists/labs rather than social impact). It’s riskier to commission programming for the minority who aren’t over the 100 point IQ barrier than to consider your audience to be intelligent and discerning. Most people spend 9 hours a day in a job they hate with their brains switched off, and aren’t resistant at all to being challenged and inspired to think by learning and experiencing new things. They do want ideas. They want concepts. Movies are based on concepts and premises. Thinking is refreshing. Discovering new things is refreshing. They want to learn and to care. They want the variety that allows them to delve into narrower places than simple “broad appeal”.

Dan Chambers may have been a famous casualty of the “upmarket” sting at Five but where i believe he got it wrong was that the programming wasn’t dramatic or pushy enough to compel viewers. Our formula is one where for each step up in the intellectual/emotional stakes may possibly alienate the audience, so the entertainment/adrenaline factor needs to go up 2 steps each time in parallel.

While i’m at it i probably should say that there is also the issue about formats being “original” or differentiated enough, as this seems to be a recurrent theme in commissioning documentation. I don’t believe there is such a thing as true originality, but i do believe there are more ideas and angles than we could ever cover and we will never run out. Experience dictates that competition means a viable market with demand and interest, and there is a very mesmerising cognitive dissonance in broadcasters being picky about originality when they only seem to commission programming in trends or that have similar/safer/tested themes and structures. Celebrity dog training may be funny in what appalling drivel it is, but it’s the bottom of a very short barrel that people at home are forced to drink from.

Ultimately we believe the need/hunger is for meaning, as i included with the pitch notes. In hard times like the credit crunch, we need to understand. We search for meaning. We lust for it like automatons. In all of the darkest periods, we reach out to learn why, not how or what. Understanding gives us comfort and hope, and satisfies that hunger. New ideas broaden and compel us to change our lives and communicate them to others – it’s a licence to be excited by what we are being shown. Being captivated by imagination, having new angles and topics illustrated to us and falling in love with what’s on the screen is the most compelling of all entertainment and escapism, and becoming more by being educated and feeling inspired is the greatest loyalty ticket any broadcaster can command. Ofcom may be heavy-handed when it comes to being objective, but why should we be if we are prepared to tell the audience we are making a case for one side and sparking off the debate? Daring to be masterful and stepping out to present programming in a dramatic and original way that allows us to discover and find joy in new unknown talent must be the most powerful incentive to turn keep the channel on and tune back in again. The joy of being surprised has been lost in television somehow over the last years.

I hope you will take these remarks in the humble way they are intended; 24 million disenfranchised households out there are looking for leadership and hope that only you can provide, and are qualified to release to them. I also hope that you will see that Devils Lane is a company that will give you truth in its (possibly unsolicited) counsel rather than telling you what you want to hear to get the cheque, and i say it to engender trust – i’d rather sell the Big Issue than do something we don’t believe in, but more importantly, that the audience don’t believe in. All it takes is for one commissioner or company to publish a program that does buck the tabloid trend and causes viewers to flood en masse when they are given the chance for everyone to follow suit – just as it happened with the first reality TV programs. The question is who that will be and when, and who the losers will be after they all pile in. I sent in Backstreet Kitchen against my better judgement as i want to get it out of the optioning processing at the BBC before it becomes re-shaped into another lame tabloid drugs program.

We’re in the midst of making an incredible movie called “Michael’s Resignation” inspired by the collapse of Halifax, and i would love to send you over the material once we have finished the edit as i believe it embodies all we are about and will illustrate our production kudos very well – it’s a 1hr Hollywood-style feature done ground-breakingly cheaply with the best young director in the UK that is truly innovative and unbelievably emotional and intense. I know for certain that no broadcaster would dare show it because of how wrenching and challenging it is, but from the interest we have in it already (which is getting out of control) that won’t be an issue when it comes to distribution.

I don’t know you well enough to know if you share the same values (although i suspect you do as you are as powerful as you are), but please do pass what i’ve said along if you do. I would love to get engaged in some vibrant debate and exchange thoughts, and it would be great to keep the dialogue open. When it comes down to it, we share a common interest and passionate vision – one to set the bar much higher and aim for a historical career of extraordinarily engrossing, headline-grabbing and world-changing television that affects the lives of millions of people.

I know this letter is very long so i can only thank you for taking the time to read it, and i hope it has perhaps given you a new perspective on our philosophy and why we are so different to other format houses and production shops. I didn’t get into business to give up easily and none of us have ever failed in what we set up to do because of underlining what we do with passion and integrity. I know those are central C4 values, hence why i know we’re naturally paired and ready for when you see the right time to punch through the grey skies of mediocrity that are out there now for those fresher sparkling pastures where watching TV is a life-changing experience.

Alex

24
Sep

writing michael’s resignation together

So yeah, we’re making a film. One of a whole list of them. It’s pointless trying to keep it a secret from the greater world as the excitement about it has started the rumour mill already. I’m getting a lot of questions. Let me try and explain the background as its moving so fast.

Last week Joby was saying to me that it was about time someone did a “Blair Witch”-style camcorder piece again, and we were firing off different drama/cinema concepts. Then the news about Halifax broke. I suggested we look at doing some TV proposals based on the recession. The first one was to do a “dead pool” thing where you bet on which company was going under next. Then Rob said we should do a version of the old story about a guy going nuts and killing all his co-workers. Bang. We were wondering what the people at Halifax must be feeling, as a lot of them are set to not only lose their jobs, but their homes and sanity too.

The amazing bit about working with Joby is that we are virtually twins - we think the same way. I write what i see playing out in my head, and when he reads or thinks, he’s shooting the movie in his head. I’m the one who is going to sex things up, and he has an incredibly cinema directorial talent that has seen him as the toast of many a film festival.

If you haven’t seen any of the video work yet, look here (if you have a question mark appear, you need to sort out Quicktime as its fucked your PC up):
http://www.devilslane.co.uk/jam

Emails went backwards and forwards, and a story started to appear about an ex-army guy, amd all the pressures that would lead him to go crazy. Next up was a soundtrack, and more and more talk of mindless killing. I suggested a short 1hr drama that would be perfect for TV, and not too much as a feature film. I started writing, and Joby started planning. We drew up a list of everything we could get for free and how we could use the film to help as many people as we could.

This is how the quick pitch for it turned out:

A traumatised ex-soldier who has begun a new life in the city as an office clerk breaks down after being made redundant as a victim of the “credit crunch” and finding his fiancé having an affair with his boss. Determined to exact revenge, he suffers a nervous breakdown and films himself ruthlessly slaughtering all his co-workers before being shot down by armed police officers in a final blaze of glory.

You can download and read the film’s treatment here:
http://www.azcameron.co.uk/Michaels.Resignation.pdf

Joby then explodes with inspiration and demands that we use our psycho’s camcorder footage as a viral to promote the film - i.e. send it round on email as a hoax purporting to be the “real” footage of an actual office massacre.

I wrote this in regards to what the film’s “message” is supposed to be:

OK well i was stumped on this at first as all we were interested in was mass killing and mindless violence. But when it comes down to it, Michael’s breakdown is about his search for meaning - about the fragility of the human soul. He went to war because he thought it meant something; he prposed to Judith because it was supposed to mean something, and he started a new carreer because he thought it would be meaningful When all those things fell apart, so did any meaning or purpose for his life. So the moral of rhe story is that without meaning or purpose, we fall apart and anyone can go nuts without it. Modern life is so meaningless (war, 9to5 life etc) that it can send anyone over the edge because we crave meaning so much.

Two days later, we had a story, characters, screenplay summary, set spec, equipment/crew list and a porudction feel. I worked out we would need around £30k to hire crew, cameras, dollies, cranes and SFX. A day later, we had a potential backer - a billionaire friend of mine who has just got into the film distribution business and is hungry to fund new productions. Especially ones where the heads of them are 2 of the the country’s hottest producers, and they’re willing to sell off the distribution rights for the production budget, a massive bargain and very profitable investment.

Then we took it even further. After putting the treatment (summary) together, i decided to write the script very differently. Instead of using one writer, we want to give unknown acting and writing a talent a foot up into the world by getting involved from the beginning. I went on to Facebook and started talking to screenwriting groups.

And so, the script for “Michael’s Resignation” is being written online by a community of budding screenwriters at PlotBot.com, evolving as each person writes a new line. We have all ages, from all over the world. The wonderful bit is that even though some contributors might just be beginners, they can come up with brilliantly creative ideas that more experienced writers can re-write for them. THey get experience, the ideas stay, and it gets made better.

Word is now reaching universities after i contacted the Deans of film departments, inviting all their students to come in and get involved in the writing.

You can sign up to work on the script for “Michael’s Resignation” by registering here:
http://www.plotbot.com/screenplays/michaels_resignation/join/29500dea

You don’t have to be a big shot writer or have any experience. Anyone can join in and write a line for it. Log in and just add one line or spelling correction if you want to. Give us your opinion, or point what the set or mood should look like.

If you’re a cameraman, stuntman, expert, make-up artist, lighting tech, organising person, general dogsbody, film fanatic, video editor, sound engineer or anything else, get in touch and get involved. If you know anyone who could help or be really good, tell them to call us. We’re looking to shoot it over 2 weeks in London before the end of the year. And yes, if you want to one of the office workers who gets shot and murdered, be our guest.

These truly are amazing days. We have Cannes and MIP in a few weeks, and now a list of some of the coolest movie ideas you would have seen in a while. My TV proposals are in the commissioning pipelines, and its going to get a whole lot sexier.

Did i say 2008 had been a bit dark? Consider that a hasty remark. One of the best years of my life.

18
Sep

nosediving into our great 21st century depression

Woah. First XL and Lehman Brothers, and now HBOS/Halifax. Lehman survived the great depression and the second world war, but got nuked by the great 21st century recession. Lloyds have now got themselves out of the shit by merging with HBOS. Earlier in the year, Halifax mailed all its employees to tell them what a “strong” financial position it was in amidst all the turmoil. Just watch now - they have twice the number of employees they need, so a third of them will be getting the chop. Enjoy the carnage. I know i will.

Update:
Looks like i was right, as the news only broke this morning.

“Thousands of jobs will be slashed and branches closed as a result of the £12bn emergency rescue of Britain’s biggest mortgage lender (Halifax) by Lloyds TSB, it was revealed today.”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1057379

I was one of a number of people who predicted over a year ago that we were on the edge of a very serious disaster when i had heard all the talk in the city of “battening down the hatches”. The bankers knew it was coming a long time ago and all the wealthy in this country who could pay for the advice moved their assets and investments overseas a long time ago.

Memorise this scripture:

“And God caused them to prosper in the desert.”

Even in the desert when everything was going the opposite way for everyone else.

If you didn’t listen to me back then, you had better listen to me now. Sit down and shut the fuck up.

The scary thing is that more and more people are talking of a “depression” than a recession. This is going to be so much more serious than expected, and it doesn’t take a genius to work out why. This may have a cutesy name to make it more palatable for you (the Disney-like “Credit Crunch”), but its a recession. And recession always last a lot longer than we expect them to.

The Western countries bankrupt themselves with 2 Middle Eastern wars, subsequently driving up the price of oil after tightening its supply (with Russia tightening up the supply of gas). China buys up the US and takes over manufacturing. Fractional reserve banks lend out vast amounts of imaginary invisible money (credit) to absolutely anyone and everyone out of sheer greed – many times more than they can lend by law (8x). Governments encourage lending to make their record shine for “prosperity”.

Meanwhile, consumers buy lots of shit they don’t need on credit cards and loans (free money!), but their salaries stay the same. Mortgages are easy to get, so everyone buys and lets out. The economy is based on invisible money nobody has, and can’t pay back. Spending credit drives retail forward, before it contracts again. Eventually the price of living gets too high, and there is no money to pay the loans back. The gap between debt and salary is too much. The housing market isn’t collapsing because of the value of houses (as they always go up), but the ability to repay. Banks will call in all their loans to pay back their own. For money they didn’t have to lend in the first place.

Having more money around in your pocket on the weekend gives you the illusion that you are prospering, even if it is a credit card. Being able to buy more things for your house is an illusion that makes you feel like you’re doing well. Other people around you who have lots more plasma TVs, computers, cars, sofas and clothes is an illusion that makes you think we are all prospering. It allows retailers to make a lot of sales when they wouldn’t normally be able to.

What do you get when you fuel economic growth by encouraging people to borrow from lenders? A collapse when nobody can pay it back. It’s inevitable. The only variable is how long the cycle lasts.

Credit that is tied to fixed assets will always survive as it is exchanged for physical wealth, so mortgages are a safe bet because banks can acquire property by default if you can’t make payments on your house. The Bank of England underwrites all national banks. That’s why we have so many interest-only mortgages – the bank owns your house. That’s right, you are a tenant, and they are the landlord. You pay their usury charge for 20 years and end up with absolutely nothing.

Sell your house now on the downturn and you are a mug because you’ll lose money. Wait and you are a mug, because you bought way too high (ever ask yourself why some land, some bricks and a roof is worth half a million?). You buy low and you sell at the highest point. Supply and demand. Simple rules. If you want a cheap house, wait a year until the market is flooded and the price is at its lowest because all the mugs are trying to panic-sell.

Economic conditions come in cycles, and it’s important to properly understand that. This depression is a cycle we are entering into that must complete. What goes up must come down as it tries to reach an equilibrium. World events push things off balance, but economies are always trying to reach a middle balancing point. The only thing that matters is the length of time of the cycle – the reaction and counter-reaction, and that is determined by world events. Economies are generally slaves rather than masters.

Lending drives up the bell curve of spending, so when the opposite of growth happens (i.e. contraction, or recession), it is the extremes of the economy that survive as the indulgent middle suffers. Rich affluent goods will always flourish as the buyers are wealthy enough to afford them in any circumstances. At the other end are the necessities for survival – utilities like electricity/gas/fuel, and commodities like food and water. Did you ever ask yourself why we have to pay for water when 92% of our planet is covered by it?

So what’s going to happen? The banks won’t be so flexible on overdrafts, and lenders won’t lend you anything after they call in as many of their loans as they can. The government will loosen up bankruptcy laws, and the current cabinet will take the blame for the problems and be driven out (it was a poisoned chalice that Gorgon Brown couldn’t resist). People will cut back on their spending and try to sell the things they have bought. Homes will get repossessed, pensions will be reclaimed and companies will make lots of people redundant because they weren’t really needed as staff in the first place.

The rich will make a lot of money from the contraction, as they always do. Drinking and gambling will increase as people try to escape, and violence will increase as frustration grows. Newspapers will capitalise on fear to sell more papers with nasty headlines. Broadcasters will pump out feelgood tabloid crap to entertain the masses away from how fucked everything is. People will move out of expensive cities to cheaper rural areas and reconsider their careers. Councils will reach for more money in taxes and fines.

Am i the only person who thinks this recession is a good thing?

Seriously, who gives a flying fuck if a bunch of greedy pretentious investment bankers and malingering lawyers lose their jobs? Granted, there will be good people mixed in the cull, but these are the same people who boast about their income at poncy wine bars and determine their whole existence on material crap. Fuck ‘em. None of them give a fuck about you. The financial industry and the usurers who make them up never cared about you and they live in a pathetic little world that is coming crashing down because of their own greed.

Because of this, a generation will learn the consequences of warmongering. If you ravage your economy to pay for thousands of soldiers to invade other people’s countries, you pay the price at home. Maybe if the city flashers have to move back to scale back it will force a lot of them to reconsider what really matters in this life. Maybe if you lose your job, you might be forced to actually do what you’ve always wanted to. Maybe this is a massive blessing and wake-up call in disguise. Maybe it’s time to think about what really matters.

Pointless consumers goods don’t fucking matter – they are sterile bullshit you are subconsciously forced to buy because you mistakenly think it will make you happy. Gadgets, clothes, accessories, flashy status symbols and so on are all just fake, man-made crap that doesn’t fulfil you or make you anything other than yet another gullible fool that has no idea who they are or why they are here. Sd now all that consumer shit is leaving, and the greed city fools are being humbled. Halleluiah.

Tomorrow i will attempt to tell the TV commissioning community something that i believe it has completely missed, and will always continue to miss. Yes, we want to be entertained and be given “uplifting” TV that doesn’t just plunder doom and gloom. But there is a much greater need in the human condition that is witnessed in times of great hardship – we search for meaning and purpose.

What got us through the Blitz was a sense of shared purpose and community. During Vietnam we wrote chants asking what war was for. After 9/11, we wanted to know why they did it. When we connect with other human beings and have relationships, we want to know who they are. We are spiritual creatures living a physical existence, and we are always needing meaning. We need to know why, because understanding comforts us. TV should help us discover meaning, as well as distracting us. It is the experience of people that brings us joy, and helping others is what fulfils us.

This depression may be your redemption. It may be an opportunity. It could be closing a door just to open a new one. It may force your hand, but maybe that was the only way you would do what you had to do. Watch and listen to who is being brought crashing down and ask yourself if you really should pity them. Ask yourself whether you should pity yourself when you knew it was coming and you don’t have to be a victim or something was always inevitable. A lifetime of happiness comes from helping others.

To change the world, you only have to change a small group of the right people. And tomorrow, i start.

“Fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives. Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn’t there?”

V For Vendetta

15
Sep

invisible division by the creativity io paradox

I haven’t written much lately, and that’s because of a mixture of things – the sheer amount of writing i’ve been doing for TV/business stuff, outright exhaustion and a little creative bankruptcy when it comes to my emotional output. I have so much to say yet i’m finding it difficult to say. In the last few weeks on my presenter search i’ve met some really amazing people. Really gorgeous ladies, and some incredibly interesting guys. I think i have it whittled down to a select few in my head now, but there is always room for one more. Tomorrow i’m at Channel Five all day so i’m getting prepared for a pitch-athon.

We worked night and day to get Virgilio’s technology done, listened to paranoid crap about the Hadron super-collider destroying the world, as well as talking to several bands who needed help in accelerating their careers. I added another 10 or so program ideas in my list, got a sarging buddy, and merged several others into packages. I got wrist-slapped by the BBC and ITV, the latter of which got very pissed off with me. Fuck them. It was a wildcard anyway as they’ve been a sinking ship for years being so tied up trying to please everyone and maintain a “broad appeal”.

And somewhere in the midst of all of that i decided to build TV formats around cooking, the paranormal and forced marriage. There are days when i will be smoking a cigarette in one hand, coffee in the other, asking myself “what the fuck am i doing?”

Sometime i need to get round to booking my trip to Israel at the end of the year.

A few weeks back i mentioned the theory that there are 2 distinct groups of people in the world – those who thirst for knowledge, and those who need to be entertained. I’ve seen it more and more, but i’ve also cross-referenced it with another two types which i believe overlap very well. The first groupings only address our input, or the things we want to consume and take inside. They are needs and things we react to, whereas to counter-balance we also need to consider our output, or how we deal with what goes outward, or the opposite direction. I even made a little graph for it.

I noticed it recently when discussed ideas for TV shows. There is a complete disconnect between people who come up with a constant flow of ideas, and those who have very few. Some people are creative, and others are just blank followers. A minority forge ahead doing new things, and the rest do their best to copy and imitate, as flattering as it may be. Because they’re always coming up with new ideas all the time, the creative mentality isn’t too worried about theft or exploitation, whereas the copiers are absolutely paranoid about it and incredibly protective.

It’s getting so obvious with me that i’m unconsciously discriminating between the two, and the truth is that i feel incredibly sorry for the ones who don’t have idea flow. My whole life and existence, as well as my understanding of meaning, revolves around ideas – coming up with them, appreciating them and realising them.

My answer to TV execs who are startled by my openness when it comes to program ideas is that we will never run out of the (and new angles on them), and there is more than enough to go around for everyone. And that is a pivotal attitude issue that defines a creative from a copier – their belief that things of value and must be hoarded, or whether there is abundance. Those who don’t come up with ideas are terrified of losing them once they are exposed to one, either their own or someone else’s they could benefit from. We will never run out of ideas, very few are 100% original (singing contests anyone?), only the creator with the vision will be able to do a proper job, and the combination of copyright, exclusivity of access and electronic paper trails is secure enough.

I just don’t understand it. It’s like holding a toy tightly to their chest and saying “IT’S MINE!” when its freely available to anyone. I have no idea what it must be like to wake up and not have a flow of ideas. All you have for company is what is around you, and consumption of distractions is the only escapism. The ability to create worlds in your mind is a life-saver on the tube. Inspiration can come from anywhere, and ideas themselves come freely to your mind so it’s difficult to justify charging for them.

Imitating and emulating others isn’t necessarily a bad thing. We all have to have a precedent to what we do. It’s not like you can be angry at those who just don’t have a creative flow going on – sometimes it’s the bane of my life as i can’t turn the fucking thing off. When people copy me i find it bizarre more than anything else. I just don’t get it. Why on earth would you just obviously do exactly what someone had done so openly that they’d know? Doesn’t it make you just feel stupid?

I think that’s the endless paradox within creative industries that is incredibly frustrating. Hundreds of billions of dollars are generated through the ideas of creative people, and the processes are administrated by a clone army of blank copiers who don’t have any ideas of their own. It’s useful i guess, as their protectionist bullshit is what helps to make the money from them in the first place.

How do you pitch ideas to those types of people who don’t have an extensive ability to visualise and conceptualise like creative types can? When you talk ideas to ideas people, they immediately fall in love with the possibilities and that excitement and shared vision drives a project on. When you’re talking to a blank drone, you have to triple your efforts to help them to get into it and be shown the possibilities because their imagination just isn’t there (they blame a lack of time etc). It’s like speaking rural Chinese to a deaf Norwegian and asking them to get into the intricacies of Arabic.

People who are envious don’t think they have enough, and look to others for what they don’t have. They don’t know how to create or envision a way for themselves to get it, so they take what is available and near to them. Describing it as short-sighted doesn’t do it justice – it’s just a total lack of initiative that can turn very malicious. When you experience someone who is envious, defensive, protectionist, money-grabbing, hoarding or just secretive, you know you’re dealing with one of those blank copiers who has little or no imagination.

There’s a grander picture to all this, and it’s about who you let into your life and allow to affect you. You have to determine where you sit on that graph – whether you are predominantly a knowledge or entertainment person, and whether you are predominantly a creative visionary ideas person or one of those sterile copying types that follows the other group around looking for their leftovers.

Then you have to work out who you’re dealing with or pitching to, which really isn’t easy as a lot of times you haven’t met them before. To inspire them or fire up that inner desire is a difficult call.

I’m finding that it’s important to know who is who in that way when it comes to my personal life. I just click better with creative types as they inspire me and connect with my own creative head. It doesn’t mean they have to be a Picasso, just have that idea flow or i find it difficult to relate and flourish, so to speak. Trying to have a hilarious time of it is too difficult when you have to explain everything or create a mental picture for others who don’t have the mentality to visualise what you are describing.

Creative doesn’t mean art, it means having a natural thought process and mindset where you can produce and understand ideas and concepts either from nothing, or from many things you put together. It’s just a natural process of making something new or adapted in your mind rather than having to adsorb it from something or someone else outside. Some are programmed to output, most just to take input.

After all, what is an idea? What is creativity and how does it happen? Many argue it is a gift of God. It would be perfectly possible for creatives to survive without the drones, but would the drones be able to live without creative people? It’s naive to associate something as subjective as worth with social role (is a doctor more valuable than an artist?, but there is a very strong argument that a) the academic system is weighted in favour of industrialisation subjects like maths and against the arts, and b) that because of their emotional, historical and transcendent quality, creative professions are massively more meaningful than 9to5 worker bee jobs.

Well, one thing’s for sure. They’re certainly a hell of a lot more fun :)





this month

October 2008
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031